W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > April to June 2002

Rationale for DAV:isdefined to be optional

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:14:19 +0200
To: <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCKECEENAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>


Hi,

does anybody remember the reason why DAV:isdefined is an *optional*
operator?

Julian

Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 07:14:58 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jim Davis: "Re: Rationale for DAV:isdefined to be optional"
Previous message: Julian Reschke: "RE: comment on DASL draft issue: qsd pseudo property"
In reply to: Julian Reschke: "RE: comment on DASL draft issue: qsd pseudo property"
Next in thread: Jim Davis: "Re: Rationale for DAV:isdefined to be optional"
Reply: Jim Davis: "Re: Rationale for DAV:isdefined to be optional"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:12:34 GMT