W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: comment on DASL draft issue: qsd pseudo property

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 09:23:43 +0200
To: "Jim Davis" <jrd3@alum.mit.edu>, <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCCEKNEKAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jim Davis
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:55 AM
> To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
> Subject: comment on DASL draft issue: qsd pseudo property
> http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-search-lates
> t.html#rfc.issue.qsd-pseudo-property
> says "It would be nice to avoid the definition of a 'pseudo'
> property just
> for this special use case".
> I agree, but is there any concrete proposal for an alternative?  if not,
> could we close this issue?  Would we be unable to submit the
> draft because
> of this issue?

This issue is in because I wanted to find out whether there are others who
consider this a problem.

I don't have a good solution yet, but I feel we should change that. An
alternative of course is to move QSD into a separate document to be
submitted later - I think everybody agrees that SEARCH is useful even if QSD
isn't in the base RFC.
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2002 03:24:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:43 UTC