W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > July to September 1999

RE: JW12: relative URI's

From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 17:07:21 -0700
To: "'DASL'" <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBIKLAGLCOPGKGADOJKEBPCDAA.ejw@ics.uci.edu>
I was originally proposing that we not allow relative URIs.  Since a search
arbiter might actually be part of, or nearby to the search scope, it's
probably OK to allow relative URLs.  The specification should be clear what
the base URI is for their calculation, though.

- Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Babich, Alan
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 3:44 PM
> To: 'DASL'
> Subject: JW12: relative URI's
>
>
> Jim W.: Are you proposing we drop relative URI's, or are you
> just making a comment?
>
> Alan Babich
>
Received on Monday, 16 August 1999 20:15:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:04 GMT