W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > April to June 1999

RE: JW2a, JW2b: Search Arbiter resource

From: Babich, Alan <ABabich@filenet.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:46:21 -0700
Message-ID: <C3AF5E329E21D2119C4C00805F6FF58FE66B2E@hq-expo2.filenet.com>
To: "'DASL'" <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
Jim W:

Maybe we have agreement. The key word for me is
"required". I don't think properties should be
REQUIRED for search arbiters. I never said they
should be DISALLOWED. The spec., being quiet on
this issue, accommodates my position (it doesn't
say they are disallowed, and it doesn't say that
you can't have them). Is your position that the
spec. should require them, or is it OK to be
quiet on that issue for the first release?

Alan Babich

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Whitehead [mailto:ejw@ics.uci.edu]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 1:40 PM
To: 'DASL'
Subject: RE: JW2a, JW2b: Search Arbiter resource




> I think of the search arbiter as just some code we want to execute
> to do a query on some set of resources. I would not like to see a
> search arbiter resource be required to be more complicated than that.
> I think search arbiters should only be required to support the SEARCH
> method.
> I would not object to putting words to this effect into the
> protocol spec.,
> even
> though the absence of any further mention of methods implies that
> that is in fact the case as it stands.

I think it makes sense for a search arbiter to have properties, but no state
associated with a GET response (i.e., GET should not work on a search
arbiter).  I think the search arbiter should support properties so it can
participate in access control (most access control protocol proposals have
employed properties in some way), and also so this extension mechanism is
available in the future.  It might be reasonable to forbid dead properties
on a search arbiter, but this strikes me as being arbitrary.

- Jim
Received on Thursday, 24 June 1999 19:45:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:04 GMT