W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > April to June 1998

RE: ANY in the DASL spec

From: Saveen Reddy (Exchange) <saveenr@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 20:41:18 -0700
Message-ID: <2FBF98FC7852CF11912A00000000000107E78664@DINO>
To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
Yes I sent some private mail on this ... the upshot: using ANY is a false
economy. It's a simpler DTD but really hides a lot of ambiguity. Avoiding
its use does make the grammar (and its description) more understandable and
if done as correctly (see her mail showing what this might look like) will
not make the grammar unwieldy.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Davis [mailto:jdavis@parc.xerox.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 1998 6:36 PM
To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
Subject: RE: ANY in the DASL spec

Just checking, but did we reach agreement (at least between Saveen and
Judy) to make the grammer specific where possible (e.g. not use ANY where
prop will do), etc?

I believe the last message I saw (from Saveen) indicated that Judy had
persuaded him.  I want to make sure that's right, and test whether there
are any others lurking who object, or perhaps all are now convinced?
Received on Thursday, 7 May 1998 23:41:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:38 UTC