W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: July CCXML Implementation Report: 10_2_3: missing transition for connection.disconnected - should be 10_2_4 - ISSUE-739

From: Petr Kuba <kuba@optimsys.cz>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:05:49 +0200
Message-ID: <4C6E8BBD.60807@optimsys.cz>
To: Baggia Paolo <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>
CC: "'www-voice@w3.org'" <www-voice@w3.org>, 'RJ Auburn' <rj@voxeo.com>
Paolo,

We confirm that we accept the proposed resolution.

Thanks,
Petr


On 20.8.2010 15:19, Baggia Paolo wrote:
> Petr,
>
> We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to IR. The goal is to finalize the test-suite during the PR transition.
> Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider it implicitly accepted.
> If you need clarifications, please ask them very soon.
>
> Paolo Baggia
> Author of CCXML-IR Plan
>
> ISSUE-739:
>
> You are right, it will be fixed.
>
> =================================
> From: RJ Auburn<rj@voxeo.com>
> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:57:03 -0400
> Cc: www-voice<www-voice@w3.org>, W3C Voice Browser Working Group<w3c-voice-wg@w3.org>
> Message-Id:<A2C692D7-C259-4187-AD1B-04A6A0661C98@voxeo.com>
> To: Petr Kuba<kuba@optimsys.cz>
>
> Tracked as ISSUE-739
>
>
> On Jul 27, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Petr Kuba wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> this report deals with test 10_2_4, assertion 1286.
>>
>> Sorry for the confusion.
>>
>> Petr
>>
>>
>> On 26.7.2010 11:47, Petr Kuba wrote:
>>> Hello www-voice,
>>>
>>> In 10_2_3, assertion 1295 shows the following code:
>>>
>>>
>>> <transition event="user.START_ASSERTION_1286" state="ASSERTION_NMBR_1286">
>>> <!--
>>> 1286
>>> 10.2.4&lt;assign&gt; and&lt;var&gt;
>>> Execution of connection elements MUST NOT immediately change the state
>>> of any associated Connection Objects mscott@voicegenie.com Accepted
>>> -->
>>> <disconnect connectionid="ConnectionID"/>
>>> <if cond="session.connections[ConnectionID].state == Connection.CONNECTED">
>>> <script>assertions[assert_index].P_F = s_PASS;</script>
>>> </if>
>>> <send targettype="'ccxml'" target="session.id" name="name_prepare_new"/>
>>> </transition>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately there is no<transition>  for connection.disconnected. If
>>> this event is delivered before the event generated by<send>  the
>>> following message is logged:
>>>
>>> 10_2_4 TA-1286: Comment: UNEXPECTED EVENT connection.disconnected IN
>>> STATE ASSERTION_NMBR_1286
>>>
>>> We recommend to handle connection.disconnected correctly to keep the
>>> test clear.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Petr
Received on Friday, 20 August 2010 14:06:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 20 August 2010 14:06:29 GMT