Dan Burnett wrote: Hi Dan, thank you for your response. Please find bellow one addtional question. >> SSML should allow foreign attributes on any SSML element. Ideally such >> possibility will not be mentioned only in prose of spec, but also XML >> schema will specify this using xs:anyAttribute (and similarly by >> xs:any for elements). > > DB>> Resolution: Accepted with modifications > DB>> Explanation: We agree that non-SSML attributes should be permitted > in the same way that non > DB>> SSML elements are permitted, and in fact the other subsections of > 2.2 describe this in detail. We > DB>> will extend the text in 2.2.3 to indicate that attributes are also > allowed. However, your request to > DB>> allow ITS attributes does not, in our opinion, introduce any more > need to generalize the Schema > DB>> than was already present in SSML 1.0 (and hence 1.1). We believe > that converting the Schema > DB>> to use xs:anyAttribute and xs:any would trivialize the Schema. We > do not plan to change the > DB>> Schema. But if my understanding of SSML spec is correct, without change to schema SSML documents with foreign elements/attributes will be always non-conforming, becuse in sections 2.2.2.1 and 2.2.2.2 validity against schema is one of conformance criterias. And if schema doesn't permit foreign elements/attributes, then such document will be invalid, and thus non-conforming. However, I'm not sure if this is true intent of specification. Maybe, if you do not want to change schema, you can say that foreign elements/attributes are stripped from conforming SSML document before validation. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Saturday, 20 September 2008 19:10:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 20 September 2008 19:10:41 GMT