W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > January to March 2007

RE: Missing Schema Docs in VoiceXML 2.1

From: Matt Oshry <matto@tellme.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:57:35 -0800
Message-ID: <FA934E050E4E254E87339959D53F5C0B01262040@EXM01.sea.tellme.com>
To: "Jason Hanna" <jason.m.hanna.at.coincident@gmail.com>
Cc: <www-voice@w3c.org>

Hi, Jason,

Thanks for pointing this out. 

The W3C Webmaster has added the missing files. Please note that these
link back to [1] and [2] which correspond to the version of SRGS and
SSXML referenced by the VoiceXML 2.1 specification.

Also note that the complete set of VoiceXML 2.1 schema files including
those dependencies are available in a .zip at [3]. This .zip is
referenced from Appendix B of the VoiceXML 2.1 spec.

If you do reference the remote schema, we recommend that you reference
it by dated ("this version") URI [4] to ensure stability. Latest version
links are inherently volatile.


[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-voicexml21-20060915/vxml-schema.zip
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-voicexml21-20060915/vxml.xsd

-----Original Message-----
From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Hanna
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 3:15 PM
To: www-voice@w3c.org
Subject: Missing Schema Docs in VoiceXML 2.1

Hi All,

First time posting to the www-voice list. I searched the mail archive
and didn't find a previous report of this issue.

I'm trying to fetch the schema documents from
http://www.w3.org/TR/voicemail21/ and I'm finding two XSDs that appear
to be unpublished in the 2.1 tree.

* grammar-core.xsd
* synthesis-core.xsd

I checked the 2.0 schema tree, and sure enough they were found. I
presume it's safe to use these. Should these two documents be published
into the 2.1 schema folder?


Jason M. Hanna
President and Founder
Coincident, Inc.
Received on Saturday, 10 March 2007 02:57:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:39 UTC