FW: R119,R120: Setting grammars programmatically

Thanks, Greg. Forwarding to www-voice for archiving purposes.

Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Inglis [mailto:Greg.Inglis@TelephoneticsVIP.co.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 12:32 AM
To: Matt Oshry
Subject: RE: R119,R120: Setting grammars programmatically

I am satisfied with the VBWG's resolution. Thanks

Greg Inglis
Software Engineer

Telephonetics VIP Ltd
"making sound 
          business sense"

Simply dial +44 (0) 1442 242 242 and ask for me by name.

For Technical Support / Fault Logging please use
support@telephoneticsvip.co.uk 

Emails to my personal address will not be managed in my absence.

www.telephoneticsVIP.co.uk

Providing innovative hosted and customer premises speech recognition and
voice automation solutions.

Winner of the National Business Awards (SE Region) Business Innovation
of the Year 2004 & 2005 and Dacorum Business Of The Year Award 2003 &
2006.

Disclaimer:
The disclaimer available at
http://www.telephoneticsVIP.co.uk/telephonetics/emaildisclaimer.jsp or
by sending email to <mailto:email-disclaimer@telephoneticsVIP.co.uk>
applies to this email.


-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Oshry [mailto:matto@tellme.com]
Sent: 29 November 2006 02:22
To: malsburg@cl.uni-heidelberg.de; Greg Inglis
Cc: www-voice@w3.org
Subject: R119,R120: Setting grammars programmatically

Titus and Greg,

The Voice Browser Working Group (VBWG) is completing its resolution of
issues raised during the review of the most recent Last Call Working
Draft of VoiceXML 2.1 [1].
 
Following the process described in [2] for advancement to Proposed
Recommendation, this is the VBWG's formal response to the issue you
raised in [3], identified as 'R119' and [4], identified as 'R120':

Thank you for suggesting this feature. The VBWG will consider it for a
future version of VoiceXML.

Please indicate before 4 December 2006 whether you are satisfied with
the VBWG's resolution, whether you think there has been a
misunderstanding, or whether you wish to register an objection.

If you do not think you can respond before 4 December 2006, please let
me know. The W3C Director will appreciate a response as to whether or
not you agree with the resolution. However, if we do not hear from you
at all by 4 December 2006, we will assume that you accept our
resolutions.

Thank you,

Matt Oshry
Chief Editor, VoiceXML 2.1

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-voicexml21-20060915/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006OctDec/0002.html
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006OctDec/0006.html

Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 16:56:29 UTC