Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Styling for MUST, SHOULD, etc

Issue R103-16

Proposed Classification: Clarification / Typo / Editorial 

Resolution: Under discussion

We think your request is reasonable, but we would like to know if there
are Guidelines on this subject for the Spec authoring. 

We are doing a search, if you have some reference, please let us know. 

Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
From: <ishida@w3.org> 
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:41:06 +0000
To: www-voice@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org 
Message-Id: <20060321174105.E69A44F400@homer.w3.org> 


Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/

Comment 16
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0603-pls10/
Editorial/substantive: E
Owner: RI
Location in reviewed document:
3

Comment:
 
Please use some markup to clarify the locations of the normative usages
of "must", "should", "must not" etc. in the text.



Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia S.p.A.

================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it. Thank you<http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com
================================================