W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: VoiceXML 2.1: xsi:schemaLocation vs examples

From: Matt Oshry <matto@tellme.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:31:37 -0800
Message-ID: <B8E24C3AF01492459438BFA2D6ECBF73045C6A91@EXCH.sea.tellme.com>
To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: <www-voice@w3.org>

Bjoern,

The Voice Browser Working Group (VBWG) is now completing its resolution of issues raised during the review of the Candidate Recommendation version of VoiceXML 2.1 [1]. Our apologies that it has taken so long to respond.

Following the process described in [2] for advancement to Proposed Recommendation, this is the VBWG's formal response to the issue you raised, identified as '111-17':

The examples in the VoiceXML 2.1 specification will be updated to reference the VoiceXML 2.1 schema as recommended in item 5 of Appendix C.1.

Please indicate before 14 November 2005 whether you are satisfied with the VBWG's resolution, whether you think there has been a misunderstanding, or whether you wish to register an objection.

If you do not think you can respond before 14 November, please let me know. The Director will appreciate a response as to whether or not you agree with the resolution. However, if we do not hear from you at all by 14 November 2005, we will assume that you accept our resolutions.

Thank you,

Matt Oshry
Chief Editor, VoiceXML 2.1

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/CR-voicexml21-20050613/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html#cfi

-----Original Message-----
From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bjoern Hoehrmann
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 2:15 PM
To: www-voice@w3.org
Subject: VoiceXML 2.1: xsi:schemaLocation vs examples


Dear Voice Browser Working Group,

  http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/CR-voicexml21-20050613/ notes that 'It is recommended that the <vxml> element also include "xmlns:xsi" and "xsi:schemaLocation" attributes'; the document does that only for one example and I think "SHOULD" is much too strong here, I would suggest to turn that into a MAY or remove it; failing that, the examples in the document should be changed to comply with the re- quirement.

regards,
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 06:31:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 October 2006 12:49:01 GMT