* Paul Grosso wrote: >It might be better if VoiceXML used something more specific >such as <?voicexml-access-control ... ?>. It would make more sense to call it e.g. xml-access-control as that's a name W3C has control over and would thus address (this part of) Dan's concern. >I suppose it's not out of the question that the W3C could >decide to allow something of the form: > ><?vxi:access-control > xmlns:vxi="http://www.w3.org/2005/03/voicexml-access" > allow="..."?> <?xml:stylesheet?> started off like that... -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/Received on Thursday, 17 March 2005 18:34:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 October 2006 12:49:01 GMT