W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > October to December 2004

QA Review of Semantic Interpretation last call draft

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:01:50 -0500 (EST)
To: www-voice@w3.org, www-qa@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0412160954480.28242@homer.w3.org>

Hi folks,

I have done a review of the conformance of the Semantic Interpretation spec
last call draft (November 8) to the QA Framework's Specification Guidelines
(last call draft, November 22).

In rough summary:

Generally the document came out pretty well. It is quite close to conforming
to the draft specGL already, which is nice. There are a couple of
requirements from SpecGL that I think the Semantic Interpretation spec should
meet but doesn't - two are editorial to do with more use of glossaries, and
one is probably more substantive and deals with the lack of any exlanation of
how to address extensibility. Since the specification itself notes that the
working group expects the spec to be extended (which is useful and valuable
information) this seems a real issue to me.

The full details are available at http://www.w3.org/2004/12/cmn-si-review

I will maintain that document to track the results of any discussion or
review of my review.

Best regards

Charles McCN

Charles McCathieNevile             http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
tel: +61 409 134 136                 fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78 22
Post:    21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia    or
 W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2004 15:01:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:38 UTC