W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > October to December 2004

RE: [v3] Video media support in VoiceXML

From: McGlashan, Scott <scott.mcglashan@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 19:39:13 +0100
Message-ID: <990C7D7B4096DC49B7BDB5D4F56E5B9F64F2D3@sooexc02.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Max Froumentin" <mf@w3.org>
Cc: <www-voice@w3.org>, <w3c-voice-wg@w3.org>

I know - we should have called it dialogML from the beginning - very
hard to change now ...

Scott
 

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-voice-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-voice-wg-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Max Froumentin
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 18:41
To: McGlashan, Scott
Cc: www-voice@w3.org; w3c-voice-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [v3] Video media support in VoiceXML


"McGlashan, Scott" <scott.mcglashan@hp.com> wrote:

> This approach does have some issues which require further analysis for

> VoiceXML 3.0, including whether there should be a separate <video> 
> element rather than re-using <audio>, and how controls for 
> video-specific operations can be added. If others on this list are 
> interested continuing this discussion offline, please let us know.

renaming <audio> to <video> prompts the question of whether to rename
VoiceXML too. DialogML? Probably not a great idea marketing-wise.

Max.
Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2004 18:41:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 October 2006 12:49:00 GMT