W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: Questions about CCXML and CCXML interpreter

From: Robert Stewart <robert@wombatnation.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:13:04 -0700
To: Werner Dittmann <Werner.Dittmann@t-online.de>
Cc: www-voice@w3c.org
Message-Id: <1094829184.4303.38.camel@localhost.localdomain>

The following W3C license is used with the W3C web browser Amaya.

For comparison in the VoiceXML space, the open source VXML browser
OpenVXI is licensed under the ScanSoft Public License, which is a very
non-restrictive license.

The ScanSoft Public License is very similar in content to the BSD

OpenSource.org has an extensive listing of licenses suitable for use
with open source projects. http://opensource.org/licenses/

As for which license you choose, it depends on what you are trying to
accomplish. For example, do you want to allow commercial uses, do you
require attribution, do you want to require that any derivative works be
licensed under the same license you choose, do you want to make a
statement against software patents, etc. Based on your email, I
recommend evaluating the following licenses in this priority order: BSD,
W3C, Apache, CPL, GPL.

For a project repository, I highly recommend SourceForge. I've used
SourceForge for a couple years to maintain open source VoiceXML
applications I've written.

I'm very happy to hear about your project. I look forward to trying it

Robert Stewart

On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 01:29, Werner Dittmann wrote:
> All,
> based on and strongly influenced by the Phonologies opensource CCXML C++
> implementation I developed
> a Java based version of the CCXML interpreter. The Java implementation
> currently supports almost all features
> of the C++ version. The Java implementation was done with J2SDK 1.4.2 and
> uses Apache/Jakarta software,
> such as Junit, log4j, commons httpclient, Xerces as supporting libraries.
> Because I would like to put this work in public domain I appreciate any
> comments which license to use:
> -GPL, BSD, Apache, is there a W3C license for publice domain/opensource SW?
> Any ideas where to place the software as opensource?
> Ideas, comments, etc. are appreciated.
> Regards,
> Werner
> mailto:Werner.Dittmann@t-online.de
Received on Friday, 10 September 2004 15:19:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:37 UTC