W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: interpretation please, ssml

From: Daniel Burnett <burnett@nuance.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:21:14 -0700
Message-ID: <7269C53CEB035F4D9074B3E35831A2BA11E5C9@MAILBOX.nuance.com>
To: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>, <www-voice@w3.org>
SSML does not define pronunciations of individual words -- that would be handled via an external lexicon.  I take it that the processor you're using is not giving you the pronunciation you would like?

-- Dan Burnett

-----Original Message-----
From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 3:03 AM
To: www-voice@w3.org
Subject: interpretation please, ssml

Given an English or US voice, lang set to en, encoding utf-8

How would you expect caf&#x00e9; to be pronounced please, in ssml.

e9 is e acute.

Regards DaveP.

**** snip here *****


NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system. 

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by 
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. 

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
those of RNIB. 

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 


Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 14:22:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:37 UTC