W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: interpretation please, ssml

From: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:05:22 +0100
Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F06FFE108@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
To: www-voice@w3.org

    SSML does not define pronunciations of individual words -- 
Noted, and not expected.
    that would be handled via an external lexicon.  I take it 
    that the processor you're using is not giving you the 
    pronunciation you would like?

My issue is the XML one. I guess basically is a word using
ncr's from outside a-zA-Z expected to be pronounced when the word
is in use, defined by being in current dictionaries?
  If the word was found in a piece of text in xml:lang='fr' then I'd 
be upset if it wasn't pronounced correctly. Where is the boundary please?

Should I have any expectations, or is this 'implementation defined'.

regards DaveP


NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system. 

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by 
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. 

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
those of RNIB. 

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 
Received on Friday, 30 July 2004 03:06:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:37 UTC