W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: Browser Support for Grammar Precedence Rules in VXML

From: Dave Burke <david.burke@voxpilot.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:41:09 -0000
Message-ID: <001f01c3ba4a$c29d70b0$ca00000a@db01.voxpilot.com>
To: "Harvey, Chris" <chris.harvey@nz.unisys.com>
Cc: <www-voice@w3.org>

Hi Chris,

For questions relating to the implementability of the spec, it might be
useful to check out the some of the public implementation reports submitted
to this archive.

Best regards,

Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harvey, Chris" <chris.harvey@nz.unisys.com>
To: "Jeff Kusnitz" <jk@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <www-voice@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 5:16 AM
Subject: RE: Browser Support for Grammar Precedence Rules in VXML



Yes that is that part of the VXML specification that I am referring to.

I am sure that the browser vendors must be members of this list.  I would be
interested to hear whether or not they *fully* comply with the specifcation
in this regard.  Complying while maintaining recogniser independance would
seem to be a non-trivial task to me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Kusnitz [mailto:jk@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2003 12:15 p.m.
To: Harvey, Chris
Cc: www-voice@w3.org
Subject: Re: Browser Support for Grammar Precedence Rules in VXML


Are you refering to the rules defined in 3.1.4 of the VoiceXML
specification?  I'd be a little surprised if someone claimed to support
VoiceXML 2.0 and didn't support them.  Implementation *should* be
independent of the speech recognizer, but I can imagine there might be
instances where a recognizer has limitations which make it difficult or
impossible to implement for the browser (if the recognizer only supported
a single active grammar, for example)

Jeff


> Has anyone out there any experience with exploiting the grammar
> precedence rules specified in the VXML spec?
>
> Specifically, do you know of a browser that supports this, and is
> this support independent of the recogniser being used?
>
> Regards
> Chris Harvey
> NZ Communications Solution Development Group
>
> UNISYS
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2003 04:41:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 October 2006 12:48:59 GMT