W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > July to September 2003

desc in audio [was: RE: some WAI comments on SSML]

From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:10:47 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030811160025.02286300@pop.iamdigex.net>
To: <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
Cc: <www-voice@w3.org>, <wai-liaison@w3.org>

At 08:04 PM 2003-08-08, Daniel Burnett wrote:

>Dear Al/WAI-PF,
>
>Thank you for your review of the most recent SSML draft.  Our responses
>are below.
>
>If you believe we have not adequately addressed your issues with our
>responses, please let us know as soon as possible.  If we do not hear
>from you within 14 days, we will take this as tacit acceptance.  If
>you believe you will need more time for review, we would appreciate
>an estimate of how much time you will need.
>
>
>3. VoiceXML took the 'audio' element from SSML,  As a result of the Last
>Call review of VoiceXML 2.0 this element got changed a bit.  Please bring
>the 'audio' element as used in SSML into agreement with the definition in
>VoiceXML 2.0, including the specification language defining and describing
>the 'desc' element.
>
>http://www.w3.org/Voice/Group/2002/voicexml20-disposition.htm#R478-1
>
> >>> Proposed disposition:  Rejected
> >>>
> >>> We believe the audio element is up to date. In what way is it not?

I believe we should accept this disposition, based on reading

  http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-speech-synthesis-20021202/#edef_audio

The rule for when to use 'desc' is there and there is a reference from the
paragraph describing 'audio' to get you to this rule under 'desc'.

Al
Received on Monday, 11 August 2003 16:10:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 October 2006 12:48:58 GMT