Re: [www-validator] <none>

On 21 Sep 2017, at 1:16, Mark D. Hamill wrote:

> Not sure why this validated. It's quite a mess of missing tags.

What tags are missing? Glancing over it, I couldn’t see any problems. 
Did you miss the parts of the HTML specification that state some tags 
may be omitted?

Received on Thursday, 21 September 2017 08:44:28 UTC