W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > September 2017

Re: [www-validator] <none>

From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:46:53 +0100
To: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>, "Mark D. Hamill" <markdhamill@gmail.com>
Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <8fcc007f-a259-1dff-15b9-608da9517eb9@Rhul.Ac.Uk>


On 21/09/2017 09:44, David Dorward wrote:
>
>
> On 21 Sep 2017, at 1:16, Mark D. Hamill wrote:
>
>> Not sure why this validated. It's quite a mess of missing tags.
>
> What tags are missing? Glancing over it, I couldn’t see any problems. 
> Did you miss the parts of the HTML specification that state some tags 
> may be omitted?
Can one legitimately have both

    <meta charset="utf-8">

and

    <link href="ct_base.css" rel="stylesheet" />

in the same document, one with an inferred </meta> and the other with an 
explicit " />" ?

Philip Taylor
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2017 09:47:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 21 September 2017 09:47:54 UTC