Re: Warning validating with HTML 4.01+RDFa 1.1

Thank you Shane and Philip for your answers. So 
currently I could already adopt HTML5 in my HTML4 
documents just because the HTML5 subset relative 
to HTML4 is officialy accepted?
Regards
Andrea Urbini




At 19:37 11/07/2013, Shane McCarron wrote:
>Sure.  And I am of course a big fan.  Anyone can 
>use XHTML+RDFa 1.1 .  I was just towing the 
>party line.  HTML5 is not done, but the HTML5 
>subset that is HTML4 parsing rules is consistent 
>with HTML4 and permits RDFa 1.1.
>
>I will undertake to ensure that HTML 4.01+RDFa 
>1.1 DTD is updated, but we can't take a position 
>of recommending its use since it has been 
>officially deprecated in a recommendation.
>
>
>On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Philip Taylor 
><<mailto:P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
>Shane McCarron wrote:
>
> > The W3C working group responsible for that document removed that advice
> > in the recommendation when it was published.  That DTD is not supported,
> > and as far as I know is not up to date.  Sorry.
>
>Oh.  That is rather disappointing.  One should not be pushed into
>prematurely adopting a work-in-progress (HTML 5) simply in order
>both to be able to use two fully-ratified standards (RDFa and
>HTML 4.01).  Would it not be better to recommend XHTML+RDFa 1.1,
>as specified at :
>
> 
><http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-xhtml-rdfa-20120607/>http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-xhtml-rdfa-20120607/
>
>linked from :
>
> 
><http://www.w3.org/standards/techs/html#w3c_all>http://www.w3.org/standards/techs/html#w3c_all
>
>which /is/ a fully-ratified standard ?
>
>Philip Taylor
>
>
>
>
>--
>Shane P. McCarron
>Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.



Andrea Urbini
Università degli Studi di Firenze
Biblioteca di Scienze Tecnologiche, sede di Agraria
P.le Cascine, 18 - 50144 Firenze - tel. 055.3288207/234, fax 055.3288394
Coordinamento Centrale Biblioteche
Via G. Capponi, 7 - 50121 Firenze  - tel. 055.2756559
e-mail: urbini@unifi.it
http://www.sba.unifi.it