W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > March 2011

Re: It isn't a standard if it has hidden rules for historical reasons.

From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:26:13 +0000
Message-ID: <4D788B25.7070800@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
CC: Aaron Oxford <Aaron.Oxford@objecttrading.com>, W3C Validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>

Thank you for the clarification, Jukka; with any luck,
Aaron will have gleaned sufficient information from
both responses to sort out his immediate problem.

** Phil.

Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 08:26:50 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: invalidate document"
Previous message: Thom Dickey: "invalidate document"
In reply to: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: It isn't a standard if it has hidden rules for historical reasons."
Next in thread: Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd): "Re: It isn't a standard if it has hidden rules for historical reasons."

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:46 GMT