Am 18.08.2010 20:06, schrieb Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd): > > > Siegfried Gipp wrote: >> Am 18.08.2010 10:57, schrieb Dag-Erling Smørgrav: >>> Siegfried Gipp<siegfried@rorkvell.de> writes: >>>> <span class="<dc:subject>Discussion about non-existent classes</span> >>> >>> ??? >>> >>> DES >> >> Ahem, is this the whole mail? I remember i wrote much more. >> >> This is just an example of how class names might be constructed using >> xml namespaces and well defined class names. So they can be verified. So >> what is strange about that? > > The syntax. Maybe : > > <span class="dc:subject">Discussion about non-existent classes</span> > > Philip Taylor > Well, the only "strange" part of the syntax here is the usage of a namespace in a class name. But that's not that strange. Just have a look at the w3c ARIA docs and f.ex. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-role/ (the role attribute module). So using a namespace prefix in a class name is possible. But it is only useful in xml (xhtml) documents, since namespaces are not usable in html. That's all.
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 18:19:14 UTC