Re: Fwd: Re: Check existence of class names from Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) on 2010-08-18 (www-validator@w3.org from August 2010)

From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:06:17 +0100
To: Siegfried Gipp <siegfried@rorkvell.de>
CC: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no>, www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <4C6C2119.6030101@Rhul.Ac.Uk>

Siegfried Gipp wrote:
> Am 18.08.2010 10:57, schrieb Dag-Erling Smørgrav:
>> Siegfried Gipp<siegfried@rorkvell.de>  writes:
>>> <span class="<dc:subject>Discussion about non-existent classes</span>
>>
>> ???
>>
>> DES
>
> Ahem, is this the whole mail? I remember i wrote much more.
>
> This is just an example of how class names might be constructed using
> xml namespaces and well defined class names. So they can be verified. So
> what is strange about that?

The syntax.  Maybe :

  <span class="dc:subject">Discussion about non-existent classes</span>

Philip Taylor

Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 18:06:51 UTC