Re: 'XHTML + RDFa 1.0' validation?

On 25-Nov-08, at 2:24 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:

> Weird that 1.2 does not have a DTD.... perhaps we should create one  
> for them?

I think the SVG WG abandoned the idea that a DTD could be useful for  
SVG a while ago, mostly because of how SVG can tend to be embedded in  
other XML languages, and vice-versa. RNG, for instance, seem to be  
more flexible in this regard than DTDs.

... not that I can claim to speak on the behalf of the SVG WG,  
obviously. Anyone from the WG reading the list?

-- 
olivier