Re: 'XHTML + RDFa 1.0' validation?

Weird that 1.2 does not have a DTD.... perhaps we should create one for 
them?

olivier Thereaux wrote:
>
>> A similar problem may occur soon as SVG tiny 1.2
>> becomes a recommendation.
>
> SVG 1.2 is a somewhat different question. Unlike HTML it really 
> doesn't need a doctype, and indeed the 1.2 version doesn't have a DTD 
> at all.

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com