Le 6 mai 2008 à 18:11, Frank Ellermann a écrit : >> As far as checking tools are concerned: I would like a way >> for a tool to say “your document (may not be strictly >> conforming foo but it) is properly using mixed features >> from the XHTML family.” > > Maybe you can identify a subset where that could still work. To clarify, a bit more, because it started with a discussion I initiated in the office yesterday with olivier ;) The goal would be to have a way to check if a document which looks like part of XHTML family could be checked for syntax and structure. Let's take a concrete example: <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:its="http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its" xmlns:aria="http://www.w3.org/2005/07/aaa" xmlns:cal="http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical#" xml:lang="en"> <head> <its:rules version="1.0" xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <its:translateRule selector="//h:meta[@name='keywords']/@content" translate="yes" /> <its:termRule selector="//h:span[@class='term']" term="yes" /> </its:rules> <title>Experimental XHTML document</title> </head> <body> <h1>Test of ITS on <span class="term">XHTML</span></h1> <p>Some text to translate.</p> <p its:translate="no">Some text not to translate.</p> <h2 class="nav" id="leftnav_label">Foo Services</h2> <ul title="Foo Services" role="navigation" aria- labelledby="leftnav_label"> <li><a href="/">Home</a></li> </ul> <p instanceof="cal:Vevent"> <span property="cal:summary">one last summer Barbecue,</span> on <span property="cal:dtstart" content="20070916T1600-0500">September 16th at 4pm.</span> </p> </body> </html> -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be CoolReceived on Tuesday, 6 May 2008 09:32:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:49:05 GMT