W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Example minimal HTML 3.2 document from HTML 3.2 specification does not validate

From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:32:30 +0300
Message-ID: <005201c8f190$511def00$0500000a@DOCENDO>
To: <www-validator@w3.org>

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:

> Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
>> My SGML is rusty, but I think the problem here is that the missing
>> start and end tags cannot be inferred when the element content is
>> empty.
> If true, would this imply this is an error in the specification of
> 3.2?

Indeed; the example minimal HTML 3.2 document is not valid (and the 
validator is correct in reporting this).

I finally found the definitive statement. "The SGML Handbook" quotes, on 
p. 310, the SGML standard, saying that a start tag may be omitted under 
certain conditions only, and  these include the condition that "the 
content of the instance of the element is not empty".

Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 15:32:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:17:56 UTC