W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Example minimal HTML 3.2 document from HTML 3.2 specification does not validate

From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:21:04 +0100
Message-ID: <488EE100.1040100@googlemail.com>
To: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
CC: www-validator@w3.org


Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> My SGML is rusty, but I think the problem here is that the missing start 
> and end tags cannot be inferred when the element content is empty.

If true, would this imply this is an error in the specification of 3.2?

--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 09:21:48 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Frank Ellermann: "Re: validator reject minimal HTML 3.2 document"
Previous message: Korpela Jukka: "Re: validator reject minimal HTML 3.2 document"
In reply to: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Example minimal HTML 3.2 document from HTML 3.2 specification does not validate"
Next in thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Example minimal HTML 3.2 document from HTML 3.2 specification does not validate"
Reply: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Example minimal HTML 3.2 document from HTML 3.2 specification does not validate"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:30 GMT