Oh dear. That's terrible. And super hard to fix because it is in TR space. For what its worth, current versions of XHTML DTDs are all in http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD I will talk to w3c pubs about how we can get this straightened out. We plan on updating the second edition draft to a Proposed Edited Recommendation in the next few weeks, which would of course solve this. But sooner would be better. I will keep you posted. David Dorward wrote: > > Shane McCarron wrote: >> Its a bug - Depending on what version of the XHTML 1.1 second >> edition DTD you are looking at, that was in there. We had a request >> to reintroduce it, but in the end agreed that could only be done in a >> different specification. I have not found target referenced in any >> current version of this DTD. Where are you looking? > http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html led me to: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> > > where running > > GET http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd | grep -i target > > gives: > <!-- Target Attribute Module .................................... --> > <!ENTITY % xhtml-target.module "INCLUDE" > > <![%xhtml-target.module;[ > <!ENTITY % xhtml-target.mod > PUBLIC "-//W3C//ELEMENTS XHTML Target 1.0//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-target-1.mod" > > %xhtml-target.mod;]]> > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.comReceived on Monday, 8 December 2008 15:56:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:33 GMT