- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:13:17 +0100
- To: www-validator@w3.org
On 24 Apr 2008, at 17:59, Andreas Prilop wrote: > On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, David Dorward wrote: > >> I agree that it is not ideal, but assuming ISO-8859-1 for UTF-8 > > The validator *already* *does* check if a document can be > interpreted as UTF-8. If UTF-8 is possible, then OK! Right - it falls back to UTF-8, then it succeeds or fails. >> is no better than assuming UTF-8 for ISO-8859-1 documents. > > No, no, no! Please read the two error reports you get on > http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/test.htm !!! The other one is "You told me to use ISO-8859-1 no matter what", then it succeeds or fails. It doesn't try one encoding then fall back to another. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/ http://blog.dorward.me.uk/
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2008 21:13:56 UTC