On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, David Dorward wrote: > I agree that it is not ideal, but assuming ISO-8859-1 for UTF-8 The validator *already* *does* check if a document can be interpreted as UTF-8. If UTF-8 is possible, then OK! > is no better than assuming UTF-8 for ISO-8859-1 documents. No, no, no! Please read the two error reports you get on http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/test.htm !!! > Your argument appears to be "I use ISO-8859-1 therefore the validator > should default to ISO-8859-1", which isn't, IMO, a very convincing > one. Am I interpreting you incorrectly? Yes! <sigh> I give up (for today).Received on Thursday, 24 April 2008 17:00:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 24 April 2008 17:00:07 GMT