- From: Gmail Directeur <directeur@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 06:24:51 +0100
- To: WWW-VALIDATOR <www-validator@w3.org>
And oh yes What about Gzip compression of the soap output? :) Karim -- http://akoncept.com Innovate Humanum Est On 9/28/07, Gmail Directeur <directeur@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi W3C folks, > > I'd like to thank you for the W3 markup validator API, > and wanted to give you some of my humble suggestions. > > 1) It would be nice, IMHO, to include in the headers some > information about caching, like "Last-Modified" and "ETag" > headers, in order to reduce the charge on the W3C validator > servers. We won't ask the server to send the xml answer > if it says that it wasn't changed sine a given date. > That would be doable, I think, by looking at the headers > of page being validated. > > 2) In the SOAP answer, it would be better, IMHO, to have > an XML content of the "m:explanation" tag. Not plain HTML > so the api consumer could use these data as it would. > > P.S. Sometimes, when i query the validator with output=soap12, > the server doesn't answer. Which is the case right now. > > P.P.S It would be also, wonderful if you publish a list of the > websites that have the validator installed on them, so > that a soap app can query randomly one server among > a list of well known servers and thus reduce the charge on > the W3C server. > > Thanks again :) > > > Karim > -- > http://akoncept.com > Innovate Humanum Est >
Received on Friday, 28 September 2007 05:25:01 UTC