W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > May 2007

Re: charset=us-ascii mandatory?

From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:10:15 +0300 (EEST)
To: www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0705101352490.18595@mustatilhi.cs.tut.fi>

On Wed, 9 May 2007, Andreas Prilop wrote:

> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
>> Is there some practical problem behind your question?
> Not a severe problem. I don't want to specify an encoding for
> http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/temp/lang-attribute.htm
> because I want the reader to select any encoding in his browser.

I see. I have a test page
without any charset declaration, for testing browser behavior, but I never 
thought it would be a formally correct page - just an intentionally broken 
page for testing.

> "charset=us-ascii" is taken by browsers to mean "charset=iso-8859-1".

So it seems. Somewhat surprisingly, IE 7 treats octets > 9F (hex.) 
according to iso-8859-1 but displays octets 80..9F as unrepresentable
(though it still treats assigned windows-1252 code positions differently 
from unassigned).

Anyway, that's not a validator issue. What matters in validation is that 
when us-ascii is declared, the validator properly reports octets > 7F as 
erroneous data.

Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2007 11:10:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:17:52 UTC