Le 6 déc. 2006 à 06:42, Ian Hickson a écrit : > On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Philip TAYLOR wrote: >> >> There has been a fairly protracted discussion recently >> concerning the pros and cons of serving XHTML documents >> as text/html or as application/xhtml+xml > > Note that in HTML5/XHTML5, any content sent as text/html is assumed > to be > HTML5, and must be checked as such, and any content sent as XHTML5 is > assumed to be XML, and must be checked as such. You can find an > HTML5/XHTML5 validator (undergoing active development) here: > > http://hsivonen.iki.fi/validator/html5/ Wrong address. The message is Le 6 déc. 2006 à 03:19, Philip TAYLOR a écrit : > it states that the (page) is "Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional" > without issuing even a warning that it is being served as > text/html rather than application/xhtml+xml. So in this case, it has nothing to do with Web Apps 1.0 http://hsivonen.iki.fi/validator/ -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2006 22:02:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:23 GMT