- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:42:40 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: david@djwhome.demon.co.uk, olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>, jkorpela@cs.tut.fi, karl@w3.org, link@pobox.com, www-validator <www-validator@w3.org>, www-html@w3.org
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > > There has been a fairly protracted discussion recently > concerning the pros and cons of serving XHTML documents > as text/html or as application/xhtml+xml Note that in HTML5/XHTML5, any content sent as text/html is assumed to be HTML5, and must be checked as such, and any content sent as XHTML5 is assumed to be XML, and must be checked as such. You can find an HTML5/XHTML5 validator (undergoing active development) here: http://hsivonen.iki.fi/validator/html5/ -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2006 21:43:04 UTC