Hi all, I've received a recent report that the "direct input" interface to the feed validator at http://validator.w3.org/feed/, which uses the rawdata feature of the feedvalidator, was failing for a number of atom feeds, but working just fine with other types of feed. Steps to reproduce: 1) go to http://validator.w3.org/feed/ 2) paste in the "direct input" box the content of an atom feed, e.g http://validator.w3.org/whatsnew.atom 3) Submit the form Result: validation fails, no error given Note that the service is using the latest svn code (as of Aug 18, 2006), but the problem has been present at least since the last codebase sync, at the end of July. I have managed to tweak check.cgi a little to get a full trace of the problem (attached). The trace, to my untrained eye, does not seem to reveal anything particular other than the involvement of a few libraries other than the feedvalidator itself. My suspicion of a library incompatibility is further justified by the fact that my test service, running the exact same code for the feedvalidator but on an unstable debian distribution, returns (almost) correct validation results. (check by going to http://qa-dev.w3.org/feed/ and reproducing steps 2, 3) Any idea what could be causing this issue? I believe that the "direct input" validation, however flawed (the document location and most relative links obviously get screwed), is useful, and I'd like to continue providing it. Thanks. -- olivier
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:22 GMT