- From: Christoph Schneegans <Christoph@Schneegans.de>
- Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 11:04:36 GMT
- To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Frank Ellermann wrote: > I'm still confused by the "missing <legend>" issue: It's now clear > that XML DTD doesn't "want" to support more details for "mixed > content". OTOH a schema can support it. > > But the "mixed content" issue is not "cannot", it's more like > "intentionally does not want". "No, that's reversing canse and effect", <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/2002JulSep/0105.html> says. > What's the rationale, if it's no problem to get this "forbidden" > mixed-effect with a schema ? XHTML 1.0 was published 2000-01-26, while XML Schema was published 2001-05-02. -- <http://schneegans.de/> |
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2005 11:09:36 UTC