W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > September 2005

Re: W3C Validator vs Schneegans

From: Christoph Schneegans <Christoph@Schneegans.de>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 11:04:36 GMT
To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <dfpct4.244.1@mail.christoph.schneegans.de>

Frank Ellermann wrote:

> I'm still confused by the "missing <legend>" issue:  It's now clear
> that XML DTD doesn't "want" to support more details for "mixed
> content".  OTOH a schema can support it.
>
> But the "mixed content" issue is not "cannot", it's more like
> "intentionally does not want".

"No, that's reversing canse and effect", 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/2002JulSep/0105.html>
says.

> What's the rationale, if it's no problem to get this "forbidden"
> mixed-effect with a schema ?

XHTML 1.0 was published 2000-01-26, while XML Schema was published
2001-05-02.

-- 
<http://schneegans.de/>                                              |
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2005 11:09:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:20 GMT