W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > October 2005

Re: [VE][25] Error Message Feedback

From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 08:25:16 +0100
To: www-validator@w3.org
Message-Id: <1130570716.7463.4.camel@cyberman.dorward.me.uk>

On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 03:37 +0200, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> David Dorward wrote:
> > ... so how about you do that?
> Something's odd here, the OP had &amp; everywhere,

No, he didn't. He missed one.

> Completely beside the point, the first &amp; isn't needed, the
> URL works also without it (second &amp; replaced by & here);

There is a difference between a URL written in plain text (in which the
character "&" is correct), and a URL written in HTML (in which "&" must
be expressed as "&amp;".

> test

Your example has all the "&" characters expressed as "&amp;".

David Dorward                           <http://dorward.me.uk/>
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad, in some way or another."
                             -- The Greatest Show in the Galaxy
Received on Saturday, 29 October 2005 07:20:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:17:47 UTC