W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > July 2004

Re: validation of noscript

From: Simon Anderson <simon@slop.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:47:23 +0200
Message-ID: <40F8771B.8090809@slop.de>
To: www-validator@w3.org

"there's no point only having the fallback in the situation where the 
script wasn't attempted to be executed at all"

You're right. I can't be sure that the script is perfect. I can only 
test it as widely as possible.
In this case, it's a simple script in a simple file and, as best as I 
can ascertain, it works in most circumstances.
In fact the only one I've found where it doesn't work is in the 
situation where "the script wasn't attempted to be executed at all".
So that is exactly the situation where there is a point in having a 
fallback. Fortunately I've got one and it works.
I'm just a bit cheesed off that it's not really supposed to.
Received on Friday, 16 July 2004 20:47:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:14 GMT