W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > April 2004

Re: URI vs URL

From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:34:25 +0100
Message-Id: <DC6E75FA-9ABB-11D8-BDC6-000A957E4F00@dorward.me.uk>
To: www-validator list <www-validator@w3.org>

On 30 Apr 2004, at 16:14, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
> I am sure that these responses are very amusing, to the cognoscenti
> at least, but is no-one prepared to offer a simple factual
> explanation as to why the universally-understood and used URL
> was apparently ditched in favour of its bastard offspring URI ?

1. All URLs are also URIs
2. The validator accepts a subset of URLs for that part of its input
3. Any subset of URLs is also a subset of URIs (as a consequence of 1)
4. Some w3c output discusses URIs which are not URLs

and from what I gather:

5. For consistency, the term URI is used globally for all w3c output

--
David Dorward
      <http://dorward.me.uk/>
<http://blog.dorward.me.uk/>
Received on Friday, 30 April 2004 11:35:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:13 GMT