W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > April 2004

Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 21:32:26 +0200
To: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Cc: validators community <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <408231f0.138007334@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* olivier Thereaux wrote:
>> My alternate format differs in the following ways:
>>   * it groups identical error messages, this helps to identify
>This is a nice addition indeed. "Ideally" we'd find a way to do both, 
>at the user's discretion.

Yes... Ideally we would have the subscription feature as noted in the
todo list. There are a number of things that could greatly be customized
but customization is basically useless without means to store these
preferences, you would not click dozens of checkboxes each time you run
the validator.

>Fair enough. Your demo shows that you can show the problem in the 
>source by putting it next to the error message. I still think that at 
>least an option should make it possible to see the whole source, as it 
>gives context, but that's just MHO.

I thought about providing more context through another expand/collapse
feature, you could click the single line source fragment and see more of
the surrounding source, or you could inline the messages in the source
code. Maybe a title='...' with more source code would be helpfull, too.
Though I am not sure about this. A number of problems can be solved if
the validator would report the current open element(s) like Tidy does

  Warning: <a> proprietary attribute "linkarea"

or instead of

  end tag for element "HEAD" which is not open 

something like

  end tag for element "HEAD" which is not open (open: html, body)

or something along these lines.
Received on Friday, 16 April 2004 15:32:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:17:40 UTC