W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > September 2003

Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 -

From: Philip TAYLOR [PC87S-O/XP] <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 11:49:39 +0100
Message-ID: <3F532443.900D60CE@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: JAMESICUS@aol.com
Cc: www-validator@w3.org

Ah, you must be reading in a proportional font;
in the monospaced original, the underlining
was for the word "exits" (qua "exists").

** Phil.
--------
JAMESICUS@aol.com wrote:
> 
> P. Taylor@Rhul.Ac.UK wrote:
> 
> <<<<<
> JAMESICUS@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > Refer to:
> >
> > http://www.cs.tcd.ie/15445/15445.html#SYSVALID
> 
> Er, pardon ?!
> 
> "c.It finds and reports an HTML error if one exits; and "
>                           ^^^^^
> >>>>>
> 
> But ..... "d. it does not report an HTML error where none exists." ..... and I am questioning whether that tenet is being compromised when "not valid" is being reported for documents via the Validator default "Fussy" mode that are in fact valid documents. Doesn't that imply that the Validator is somehow reporting errors?
> 
> James Pickering
> http://www.jp29.org/
> Computer programming since 1951 (IBM 407)
Received on Monday, 1 September 2003 06:52:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:09 GMT