- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:52:28 -0500
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>, rigo@w3.org, w3t-dev@w3.org, W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>, Irene Vatton <irene.vatton@inrialpes.fr>
There is some tradeoff between prettiness and flexibility. If e.g. the namespace prefixes are fixed, things look prettier, but are less flexible. Regards, Martin. At 07:49 03/11/06 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote: >* Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> [2003-11-06 07:46-0500] > > > > > > Le jeudi, 6 nov 2003, 燼02:26 America/Montreal, Martin Duerst a 蜒rit : > > >At 15:53 03/11/05 -0500, Karl Dubost wrote: > > > > > >>You can validate a multinamespace document only with XML Schema and > > >>not with DTDs. DTD technologies can't be used for multi-namespaces. > > > > > >Not exactly true. DTDs can be constructed for multi-namespace documents > > >if the namespaces and namespace prefixes, and the location of the > > >namespace declarations, are known. > > > > I'm interested by the solution, because I have seen only ugly hacks for > > that in DTD :) > >He didn't say it was pretty...
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2003 22:43:02 UTC