W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > November 2003

Re: Validator and XHTML 1.1

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:52:28 -0500
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20031106214901.05bc0f10@localhost>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>, rigo@w3.org, w3t-dev@w3.org, W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>, Irene Vatton <irene.vatton@inrialpes.fr>

There is some tradeoff between prettiness and flexibility.
If e.g. the namespace prefixes are fixed, things look prettier,
but are less flexible.

Regards,    Martin.

At 07:49 03/11/06 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote:

>* Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> [2003-11-06 07:46-0500]
> >
> >
> > Le jeudi, 6 nov 2003, 燼02:26 America/Montreal, Martin Duerst a 蜒rit :
> > >At 15:53 03/11/05 -0500, Karl Dubost wrote:
> > >
> > >>You can validate a multinamespace document only with XML Schema and
> > >>not with DTDs. DTD technologies can't be used for multi-namespaces.
> > >
> > >Not exactly true. DTDs can be constructed for multi-namespace documents
> > >if the namespaces and namespace prefixes, and the location of the
> > >namespace declarations, are known.
> >
> > I'm interested by the solution, because I have seen only ugly hacks for
> > that in DTD :)
>
>He didn't say it was pretty...
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2003 22:43:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:10 GMT