W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > January 2003

Re: nosgml options

From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
Date: 23 Jan 2003 20:25:35 +0200
To: "Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk>
Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Message-Id: <1043346334.12932.610.camel@bobcat.ods.org>

On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 19:11, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:

> I installed the validator locally as I was finding the W3C server typically
> took 20s to delivery result pages to my application. However, I've found that
> it takes about the same locally as well. Now I've verified that check runs for
> about 2s and I've sat watching the network traffic appear about 15s after this
> exits. So, is this a known issue?

No, I can't reproduce it locally or on validator.w3.org.  For example,
validating <http://www.w3.org/> takes about 2-3 seconds here, using
either a local instance or validator.w3.org.  What is your
"application"?  Can you reproduce the delay with a browser?

> Perhaps it's the result of setting server-parsed on .html files for the
> validator?

I don't think so, I guess validator.w3.org doesn't use that setup, but
uses XBitHack for its .html.  And my local setup uses the server-parsed
one.

-- 
\/ille Skyttä
ville.skytta at iki.fi
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 13:25:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:05 GMT