W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > January 2002

Re: validator not doing application/xhtml+xml

From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:05:43 +0000 (GMT)
To: Simon Hill <red_one@othersdietrying.com>
cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-validator <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.43.0201141105061.608-100000@phaestos.ee.surrey.ac.uk>
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Lloyd Wood wrote:

> On 14 Jan 2002, Simon Hill wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 04:03, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> > >
> > > Individual draft. If it was adopted by an IETF WG it might be more
> > > convincing as something to start work towards...
> > >
> > > But really, RFC3023 already puts the +xml suffix convention on the
> > > standards track; that is more than enough to go on, given that
> > > application/xhtml is already supported.
> >
> > so as far as the IETF is concerned, what's the mime type for XHTML?
>
> I'd guess application/html, based on RFC 2584.

gah! text/html...

sorry,

L.

<L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>
Received on Monday, 14 January 2002 06:40:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:00 GMT