W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > January 2002

Re: validator not doing application/xhtml+xml

From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:00:27 +0000 (GMT)
To: Simon Hill <red_one@othersdietrying.com>
cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.43.0201141059060.608-100000@phaestos.ee.surrey.ac.uk>
On 14 Jan 2002, Simon Hill wrote:

> On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 04:03, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> >
> > Individual draft. If it was adopted by an IETF WG it might be more
> > convincing as something to start work towards...
> >
> > But really, RFC3023 already puts the +xml suffix convention on the
> > standards track; that is more than enough to go on, given that
> > application/xhtml is already supported.
>
> so as far as the IETF is concerned, what's the mime type for XHTML?

I'd guess application/html, based on RFC 2584.

L.

<L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>
Received on Monday, 14 January 2002 06:00:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:00 GMT