- From: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:46:17 +0900 (JST)
- To: www-validator@w3.org
Terje Bless <link@pobox.com> wrote: > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3236.txt > > # This document only registers a new MIME media type, > # 'application/xhtml+xml'. It does not define anything more than is > # required to perform this registration. > > This is not progress; this is status quo. The first I-D said as much. This *is* progress. Now that 'application/xhtml+xml' appears in the IANA MIME Media Types registry [1], and people may officially use it, for example, the validator may support it. That's quite different from something just mentioned in an I-D. > Is > there reason to believe I will find something more substantive later in > that document when I find the time to read the rest of it? What "substantive" information you are looking for? [ If you want to continue this discussion, please move to www-html@w3.org. This is no longer a validator's issue. ] [1] http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/ Regards, -- Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org W3C - World Wide Web Consortium
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2002 04:46:28 UTC