W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > December 2002

Re: says it's valid, but it isn't even well-formed

From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:20:03 +0100
Message-ID: <3DF5BFD3.1010605@pinkjuice.com>
To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
CC: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>, Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>


Terje Bless wrote:


> The limitations in OpenSP's XML support are:


I'm looking forward to when a real XML validator will be used.

It would be best if several choices would be offered to the user:

   * Xerces-C (eg DOMCount or other Xerces-based)
   * Xerces-J
   * xmllint
   * others

Tobi

-- 
http://www.pinkjuice.com/

Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 05:20:31 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Moritz Mahling: "HTML-Valid Image"
Previous message: Terje Bless: "Re: verbose options bug?"
In reply to: Terje Bless: "Re: says it's valid, but it isn't even well-formed"
Next in thread: Nick Kew: "Re: says it's valid, but it isn't even well-formed"
Reply: Nick Kew: "Re: says it's valid, but it isn't even well-formed"
Reply: Terje Bless: "Re: says it's valid, but it isn't even well-formed"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:07 GMT